ТОП-5 лучших эмуляторов Windows для Android. Google Chrome. Стать представителем. Tor Browser — веб-обозреватель для мобильных платформ, обеспечивающий конфиденциальность в Сети и позволяющий посещать заблокированные на территории страны ресурсы. Для скачивания нажмите на ссылку, которая находится под описанием, загрузка начнется автоматически.
It is a privacy tool that can hide your IP address and enable you to get past firewalls and access websites that are blocked in certain areas of the world. And if you want to know how to access the deep web safely, here are some guides I created for all devices:.
Before starting Tor, you need to connect your VPN. PureVPN will make you way more anonymous. This helps prevent potential vulnerabilities on Tor. Table of content. About Contact. Шаг 1. Введите в браузерной строке about:addons для того, чтоб открыть перечень установленных расширений по умолчанию в Tor Browser:.
Ежели для вас это посодействовало, то сможете прямо на данный момент закрыть данную страничку, а ежели нет — перебегаем к последующему способу. Думаю разумно, что для того чтоб включить JS — необходимо выбрать самый щадящий режим сохранности в браузере Тор.
Просто необходимо осознавать то, что ежели вас взломают в сети Тор, то тогда бесполезно находить виновных, т.
|Tor browser for iphone mega||872|
|Эффективность тор браузер mega||150|
|Plugin flash tor browser megaruzxpnew4af||166|
Mozilla has been doing a great job at improving privacy for their users lately. There is Firefox Focus, implementation of containers , accepting patches for Tor Browser investing a considerable amount of their own time on advice and review , matching donations to Tor and much, much more. Do you really want to blame Mozilla? Also, it rather odd to blame someone for trying to do the right things.
More importantly, over the years there have been a number of widely reported new stories about some huge company forgetting to update a cert. A serious mistake, but a mistake which to their credit Mozilla quickly fixed. Sadly, I must agree with the final assessment. In most cases, the reasoning the general public hears, is not true. There are multiple channels that can be used to ensure that a specific event does or does not happen, and something that has been a stable capability for years is not suddenly affected.
This spans across any organization which must fund their resources based on time-spent towards a specific Goal and Objectives. By blocking and preventing key components from being installed and used, especially for those that have been around for as long as NoScript has, this change was conscious and intentional, with the target for what this add-on offered to the public.
And, while the Organization shall find a so-called "workaround" or eventually permit the originally branded product to be used, this entire approach to suddenly remove its ability from the platform did nothing but buy some time for the platform developers to devise a side-step to what shall eventually be permitted. Make no mistake about it. It is a sad day folks Your privacy and all aspects surrounding your public and private life can and is likely to be impacted.
A timer is hard-coded to call verifySignatures every 24 hours after you open the browser, but other actions may call it at any time. It helps with Windows TBB. Old versions are just as susceptible and have more unpatched vulnerabilities. I have been hoping that Tor Project would move from Firefox to a Chrome based browser, after Theo de Raadt said Chromes security is better. Firefox is a derivative of the Mozilla code base which used to be known in the general public as Netscape. Go figure.
Otherwise it would have been easy for Mozilla to unbreak all the disabled extensions. I disagree. However, privacy-wise which is Tor Browser all about! Being proprietary, it is impossible to audit the code. Even if we choose to base tor browser on chromium instead of chrome, it would be a maintenance nightmare to make absolutely sure all anti-privacy features has been turned off in chromium.
See also comments further up. Chrome well, Chromium, which is the open source version is significantly better. Chromium has more and better security mitigations that make traditional exploits very hard to use and necessitate complex and unreliable exploit chains. Firefox is much easier to exploit. Chromium is much harder to track and requires a bigger and more dedicated team to manage, even if it is more secure.
I hope that TP is trying hard to make that difficult. When I find bugs in software that people rely on e. I am not an exploit broker who sells bugs, and I despise people and companies which do. You need to look at the long-term part: which browser is actively rewriting core parts of its browser into a memory safe language Rust? Stylo, WebRender,.. Firefox is dead since their intentional ridding of ALSA as a fallback audio interface in Linux, their sly attempt at adverts as a browser and these incidents Palemoon Browser needs more publicity Yes, Pale Moon is the bloat-free, lightweight version fork of Firefox, i love it too.
It would be optimal for Tor. Reading it on Pale Moon at the moment :. Robot because Firefox knows you do. Nothing we know indicates this particular event, the expiration of an intermediary PKI certificate, was intentional.
If you disable that, you wont receive the "hotfix" - corporate fear tactics. Hi friends Thank you very much indeed for all your efforts and permanent support Yes, not using Tor Browser during one or two days until the update fixing this is available can be an option. The other option is the workaround mentioned in the blog post.
Adding security features after the fact as Mozilla tries to do with FF is not the best way, but currently it may be the best way TP can actually use. In general, simplicity is better for security, but many users would complain if TP adopted a new browser which simply does not allow complex risky things like watching videos. Google Chrome - Spyware. Has anyone noticed that The Tor Project has been open and honest about this problem? Anyone notice that posts critical of The Tor Project have remained?
We also did not test the dormant feature introduced in 0. During this time, malicious actors are likely to take advantage of the fact that many people do not read this blog. This is a big deal and puts into question trust in Mozilla. Take advantage in what way?
I guess there could be a greater number of tor users now with JS enabled and thus more potential victims, but The browser gives you a big yellow banner the moment NoScript is disabled. If you moved the security slider above its default "low" in the first place, than you should have a pretty good idea of what that warning means and the implications of it. If you choose to go on using the browser without NoScript, and you choose not to check the Tor blog for news about the issue, then it kind of becomes your own fault.
The problem is that the higher settings of the security slider offer substantial security improvements which might really be needed by some users for some things, and for a short time some of them might not have realized that NoScript had been disabled which broke the higher settings.
Right now there appears to be no reason to think the cert expiration was deliberate it is well known that large organizations have a lot of trouble avoiding this kind of mistake entirely so there is reason to hope that adversaries such as NSA were caught flat footed just like we were, and were unable to quickly exploit the problem to attack us.
We hope. In addition to disabling a security feature, does this change the browser fingerprint at all? Why is Tor Browser "phoning home" to Mozilla anyways? Add-ons, for one thing, do. Tor Project works with the developers of the add-ons it bundles and audits their source code.
Because Tor developers made stupid decision to move from 52 ESR to corporate controlled This is direct and expected conclusion for that. Tor devs often face tough choices to be made in a short time with imperfect information. On the whole I think they tend to make the best possible choices under often difficult circumstances. I hope you will consider making a donation to TP. Georg Koppen, why do you, as the only one decision-making person, publish this inconvenient blog post about forcing users to manually switch off the security feature in order to make Tor Browser to operate properly instead of doing an emergency release with NoScript added to sig verification exceptions as Torbutton?
We are currently working on an update, but this cannot be done instantly. Mostly because keeping Tor users informed about critical security issues is obviously an absolutely appropriate thing to do. Also, the problem is that Mozilla goofed by letting a certificate expire, which had the horrible effect of silently disabling NoScript, an essential part of TB security. However, this kind of exception has the risk that there might be holes open now to get you a non-signed malicious NoScript installed.
So, there is a trade-off to make here as well. OMG, not having no script really sucks. I was ad-free at a spot I visit often. I hope whatever this problem is, it can be solved. Changing "xpinstall. In regular Firefox I did a manual check for addon updates - were none. Restarted Fx - no change. The real fix to this would be to develop on the Gnome or KDE browsers instead. If people keep using chromium or firefox as bases they will inevitably keep breaking features and by extension users privacy and security.
Firefox has been slowly feature creeping to a standard that the big tech companies want: more cloud features, more 3rd party extension, and less data actually kept securely in the hands of their actual users. One important point no-one is talking about: when did the cert expire and when did Mozilla learn about the problem? If this was an unrecognized critical flaw for many months that would change this from "a serious blunder which could potentially endanger people all over the world" to "a serious blunder which likely cost an unknowable number of political dissidents their lives or freedom".
Thank you, every bit of information helps. What I really need to know now is when the certificate which caused the problem actually expired. Note for anyone following the link, the "fix" they describe does not apply to Firefox ESR, which will be fixed "soon". You can grep just the names, dates, and times by doing: openssl pkcs7 - in mozilla.
From what I read this cert should have auto updated. Believe that post was on reddit and if true its not looking good for Tor. When a cert is created, the "before" and "after" dates are displayed or manually entered.
I would prefer the comparatively lesser known Icecat browser. I like their user centric approach to privacy. Desktop: www. This problem seems like a simple enough oversight, especially as the advice has always been to not to install add-ons.
Functionality integral to Tor Browser should be integrated into Tor Browser: In this case that would mean building NoScript functionality into Tor Browser rather than continuing to employ it as an add-on. Please look into making this happen in a future release. While Chromium seems more secure to some people, as it probably contains more security features the following also needs to be taken into account: - The source code is very hard to audit.
For Apple, the people using some of their products Iphones and Ipads are a threat. As such, the design decisions and the code written carry out that political goals. It might also not be a very good idea to spend an enormous amount of resources just to keep up developing and maintaining that privacy and freedom retrofitting as the new versions of Chromium are released.
Spending that amount of resources in a way that is more sustainable and has greater long term impact would be wiser. It would also have greater political impact as it could make the organizations that develop free software browsers better, and more generally try to influence web standards to respect users freedom and privacy and try to empower users as much as possible. I agree with previous comments, even if Mozilla stays oblivious TOR really needs to have some means of avoiding things like that in the future.
To put it simply. Tor browser is no longer safe as scripts cant be blocked but the so called work around also causes security problems. Are we supposed to just not use tor until this is fixed? It seems like the most obvious question to me. So after the workaround you can use Tor just fine.
I am waiting for newest update or smallupdate for this problem. Echoing ticket Well, to begin with Mozilla took way longer than usual to provide a fix and they needed several trials to get this right as this is more complicated than it looks. Additionally, we need to test a bit more than usual as well as we need to add an additional fix on top of what Mozilla ships as the solution interferes with one of our patches.
We plan to push the update live in a couple of hours. Apache Server at people. It is not blocking connections from Tor: -build1 has been removed as we needed to do a new build. Tor messenger should have been active as well, at least a software which makes any messenger software a Tor messenger, by making changing changes in network setting of a PC. I never used Tor messenger I just think it should have been there.
I always want to donate, I want to donate every now and then Once the bug patch is released, your team deserves a couple full days off. Your weekend was ruined. But thank you all. Is it in a log somewhere? Convenience is the enemy of security.
I actually hate gestures. I often have the problem that an unintentional gesture maximizes TB, a real no-no. And I have no idea what motions the FF developers intend to be gestures. Is this Mozilla certificate expiration and NoScript disablement a very tasty vulnerability for adversaries to exploit and deanonymize Tor Browser users by creating one or more fake Mozilla add-on certificates now or at some other times in the near or more distant futures? Can a powerful adversary exploit this vulnerability in Tor Browser thanks to the vulnerability caused by the mismanagement of Mozilla certificates for add-ons in Tor Browser?
Does this indicate Mozilla is wittingly or unwittingly caving on the user security front? Does this mean Tor Browser will be operating with lowered thresholds of user security going into the future? What is the best recourse for worried Tor Browser users operating in countries with dangerous authoritarian governments where communications with the outside world via Tor can bring arrest, torture, imprisonment, or execution at the hands of the state? In light of this exposed compound weakness in Mozilla, NoScript, and Tor Browser, is it risky or dangerous to continue to use Tor Browser if a user faces a powerful and dangerous adversary?
I am not a coder but I think the answer to those two is "no". But we users are not wrong to be horrified. Seems it could have been much worse, but this should be a wake-up call. This vulnerability was not triggered by the name on the certificate; it was triggered by the time at which the cert was set to expire. It would be extremely difficult to deliberately insert a fake Mozilla certificate without anyone noticing; much harder than the cause of this bug. Every certificate in the chain from the top root - ca - production - amo is labeled as being issued by Mozilla Corporation.
If you trust what the certificates say, then only Mozilla and the add-on submitter are in the chain. The inclusion of the cert to the Mozilla software repositories is reviewed and then cryptographically signed by Mozilla developers. Tor Project later releases reproducible builds of Tor Browser. If any cert for add-ons is faulty, the browser displays a yellow warning bar.
Hypothetically, it may be simpler to coerce or spearphish a Mozilla developer to compromise the private key. Mozilla could make a new key to replace a faulty key anyway as quickly as they made the one in the fix. Which vulnerability? The absence of NoScript can be exploited because individual browser fingerprints became more identifiable on Safer and Safest. The cert chain, however, appears to be totally controlled by Mozilla, no third parties. The recent event was dubbed "armagadd-on 2. It was reported about 39 minutes after it expired.
The original " armagadd-on " in was reported about 7 days before it expired. Unwitting is more likely. People forget expiration dates for all sorts of things. In the world of computing, another example seen very often is when a website domain name is not renewed. No, definitely higher. Hopefully, when they saw the yellow warning bar, they stopped browsing to new pages and closed Tor Browser or started a New Identity to close all their tabs. Then, hopefully, in the new session, they came straight to this blog to look for updates and help.
The basic difference was that their traffic became similar to browsing on Standard. Not exactly, but similar. The bad news, mainly, is that those sites and third-parties observing traffic from the exit node could have recorded a browser fingerprint that was more able to relate their traffic to their other traffic despite being from a crowded exit node or a New Identity. If they closed their tabs, their best recourse is to do what they would do similar in manner as if they had been browsing on Standard in that session and until they installed the fix.
As if this bug was recognized and fixed before the cert expired. Just remember to roll back any workarounds you did. I have version Has no one had success performing this upgrade? Instead we provided an update that fixes the problem.
We thought it would be better to spend our engineering capacity to get a fix out as fast as possible and inform about the problem in this blog post instead. Advertisements, pop-ups, gifs and audio run wildly rampant!
Little question here: does that xpinstall. After a couple of minutes though, the yellow warning banner appeared, the NoScript icon disappeared and Add-Ons manager reported it as disabled. I re-downloaded rc1 and re-installed, immediately changed the NoScript setting and all seems stable now. Could one of the devs, if they read this, please confirm that NoScript The NoScript version is good. We found a bug in our -build1 which resembles the one you experienced which made us doing a -build2 which is the final 8.
Hope this solves the problem permanently for you. I continue to trust and thank the Tor team for the work they did, but the huge "incident" on Saturday and especially the lack of any information really makes me doubt Mozilla. Maybe, perhaps, the suggestion to rebuild a new Tor Browser around something other than Firefox would be a good thing Mozilla was releasing lots of information.
Some was on their blog and support site, but the majority of work was being done hurriedly in their development communication channels, bug tracker, source code branches, etc. Just an hour or so ago, extensions in my Tor browser went bust. I have two Ff, The I hate the idea of anyone fussing around with my computer or switching off any add-ons in my browser with no warning and without my consent. It seems Mozilla will use the chance to peddle its latest version, so I might have to look for a new browser.
For now, only Tor and an utterly outdated K-Meleon are left - and the I downloaded a Palemoon yesterday and it seems I might get used to it. Does anyone know if there is a portable version of Icecat? This is a bane of security. Better to have people have to toggle it again than to leave people accidentally unguarded. This case is a disgraceful crash in your project.
Blame everyone who works in the project. I think in the future you need to forever get rid of add-ons from the site "mozilla" and other third-party repositories. You need to create your own repository tied exclusively to your project, with additions specifically for Tor Browser, signed by your signature and only your certificates. This will allow you to avoid such embarrassment in the future.
And users will be satisfied. Related: comment Indeed, while the original mistake at Mozilla was a serious good, Mozilla also responded quickly. Actually, I think everyone who worked over the weekend to deal with the emergency deserves a lot of praise and a fine dinner.
If enough people donate enough money hint hint many long-standing worries can be addressed in a more direct manner. So, as of EST, I see a posting at mozilla. Having no idea what that might mean in reality, I started up TOR 8. It says that 8.
Are we done now? Or is the great add-on CF still in process? Update to 8. The issue in TOR still remains unresolved, when will this be fixed, however I do appreciate the work the devs have been doing to resolve the issue, might be good to actually put it on the heading on TOR page so people dont download the previous version of TOR until the fix is completed.
Agreed completely! A warning on the download webpage or disabling all download sources! Too late. No reason to warn downloaders anymore. The new ESR firefox has been out for hours. So I installed 8. But now my "Tor enabled" onion icon, upper left, is blinking with a yellow triangle.
Is FBI on its way, or what does that mean? Until today, Roboform Password Manager was working fine with 8. But today it has been disabled. Even downloading it again from Mozilla Addons site, it says that the file is corrupt. Why it was working fine and stopped working. How can I fix it? Idk about you guys but i made my extensions work again in normal Firefox by just resetting the browser to defaults and login back into my account to get back addons and settings.
I am a "user" in both the regular and the social sense. I "use" without really giving back. So the least I thought I should do after many years of Tor use is to add my voice to thank and encourage Tor devs. The far-and-away number one threat to free and open source development projects in my more than 30 years of observation is the loss of dedicated developers.
Hell, the loss of moderately interested developers. Being subjected to hyperbolic attacks is often the beginning of people drifting away. Do remember that the vast majority of Tor users will never participate in a forum discussion, but they represent the true value of your work.
One comment rightly pointed out that that work for meaningful numbers includes protecting their very lives, and so some upset is not unexpected. But also remember that there are those who are served by discouraging Tor developers and creating dissension in the Tor community. When you see something that is particularly offensive, or that makes you want to walk away, just consider that is probably what the source wants.
In the world as it now is, your work is exceedingly important. With Western democracies themselves becoming more authoritarian the importance of your work just continues to grow. Very well said and very true. Thank you for pointing this out to others. This is my first post after using Tor for many, many years. Complaining, and "acting" knowledgeable are certainly not worthy in any sense.
People need to realize what open source is and then dig deeper. If a person is that concerned about the issue, stop using Tor until the next update which will include the proper fix. I see many instances of dissent that illuminate neglected things to improve or reconsider. Seeing through the emotion sometimes reveals a technical or ethical issue. It helps mentally if you do tech support but have a relationship to apply it to development at the same time.
Years ago I often tried to make that point but you said it much more graceful;y and concisely than I ever did Mozilla released a fix, ESR When will a new TorBrowser version be available? Depends how one looks at it. Technically, yes, going by the default settings, time-checking disabled it locally.
On the other hand, expiration time is managed remotely. Certainly, though, it says nothing about intention. In assessing a security issue it is vital to accurately understand the technical details. Ourselves, the code, our build machine, crypto algorithms, math, The development, knowledge, and many studies are public and open if we rise to meet the challenge.
They did. There are more ways than having blind trust and subservience for everyone and everything in the production chain. While being thankful that TP people are doing the work, acknowledge that most of us, we users, would be welcome, and many are able to learn and get involved, but we are choosing not to do the work. Far from urging anyone to abandon all hope, I was urging people to take heart from the fact that while the Tor community is endangered by many enemies, some lavishly funded, our enemies have problems of their own and our situation, while precarious, is by no means hopeless.
I never urged anyone to "have blind trust" for example, I always urge people I know to verify the cryptographic signatures before installing the latest TBB. I have argued that given our incomplete information about the hazards Tor users face, we need to try to guess an appropriate threat model which attempts to prioritize threats by the potential damage and the likelihood that they will soon be realized in practical attacks on us.
It is possible that you confused me with another commentator? Easy to do when almost everyone here is anonymous. Bugfix release is out, hooray! BTW, thanks for the necessary reminder to rollback the workaround! PS: I see some interesting and important points made regarding my personal distrust toward NoScript and general addon use preferences and its impact on privacy, but going to write replies later if you allow.
Have to ensure all my affected foxes got their fix and brought back to security. Compare it with the systemd buglist, a new must have Linux core component. There are valid concerns about systemd which are similar to concerns expressed in this thread about Chromium and Firefox. AFAIK there is not yet any evidence of actual collusion with bad guys, however.
I hope the Tor Browser devs have realized this already, and are working on some remedy. At the very least, the Browser should always display a warning if something is not quite as it should be. So the user can make a decision about what to do. Obviously we need to know before we load and use a website. An intermediary signing certificate owned by Mozilla expired, and the browser is configured to disable add-ons whose certificates are expired.
When the browser disables an add-on, it displays a yellow bar across the top of the browser tabs that warns the user by saying, "One or more installed add-ons cannot be verified and have been disabled," followed by a "Learn More" button. Did the yellow bar not display for you? I certainly did not notice it. So I think, and am pretty sure, there was no warning.
I am aware the add-on did not literally disable itself. Poor choice of words. But the point is: a security feature was disabled without the users consent - it was automatic, decided by an outside entity, with the "undo" button explicitly removed. This should not be possible, especially in the TorBrowser. Actually I think it would have done before we all updated to TB 8. This incident could have had a much more dire impact in the real world if it had happened just before May Day instead of just after May Day.
Looking ahead to the upcoming Tiananmen Square anniversary we should all try to make sure we know how to spot such problems if they arise again. A popup could help a lot if it can be done safely. Half the add-ons in my regular Firefox have been disabled. Besides 1 UI add-on, all of those disabled relate to security and privacy disconnect, privacybadger,.. Mozilla wants me to install an add-on they made, which at this point I wonder if I can trust.
And some people report it does not even fix the problem. The alternative? Install the newest Firefox. They just force you to update your browser? What awaits me in the code of that software? These past years forced updates always had "something bad attached".
I started up an old Firefox version, which somehow was still on my hdd: same add-ons, but no problems there. Interesting, all add-ons working fine, if your version is old enough. So the cause was introduced recently? Well, I guess TorBrowser is going to see even more use from me. Though incidents like this make me wonder, who we can trust. Or more to the point: can you trust the people you trust, to trust the right people. Meanwhile, anyone who is dependent on the security provided by the higher security levels can apply the following workaround: Open the address about : config in the Tor Browser address bar At the top of the page, search for xpinstall.
Sorry for the inconvenience. Comments Please note that the comment area below has been archived. Setting the pref to false…. Problem is that…. Me too. Is it better to uncheck…. Is it better to uncheck update add-ons automatically? Autoupdate from…. Autoupdate from unverified sources is major security issue.
But it has no effect on the disabled status of NoScript. In this case you should use…. What is true time machine…. What is true time machine please? Stop moaning you lame ass…. I agree that posters who are…. You are right. In the fact is was more…. Bookmarks are stored in the…. У меня в связи…. Was he disputing the fact he…. Was he disputing the fact he was charging them or just non-disclosing it?
First, about:preferences…. Plus one. This is helpful. Is that supposed to be irony…. I think the disabled…. That is a good point. The safer fix is to wait for…. The safer fix is to wait for the update. Avoid web-surfing until the…. We now have a build that we…. The blinking is expected as…. The blinking is expected as the version is not releases yet and, hence, not recommended. Me too; the fix in 8. It turns out the fix was not….
Does this mean that TB 8. Whew, OK, thanks, this…. However, I use "safer" and "safest" almost exclusively. Not found. Signed is NOT verified by Mozilla. But you can install addons…. I consider signature checks…. Go to…. Very wise People must understand that…. People must understand that Signed! To take control from you of…. Supposedly using Chrome…. Google is just evil. Is openly publishing for…. This is crazy dangerous and…. True, this was a serious…. The problem also affected a…. Nothing is expired, they….
Nothing is expired, they have timer that checks signatures every 24 hrs, like in corporate gaming consoles, look for yourself here: app. The intermediate signing…. Another perspective: The sig…. But I would…. There is more to this and a…. In an ideal world, clearly…. Not an ideal world is…. So how do Tor Project and…. So how do Tor Project and ordinary users make something analogous happen for TP? After setting it to false….
Calbillie What browser…. Chromium would be the…. Chromium-proper contains…. Chromium-proper contains Google integration. Ungoogled-Chromium might be a better option? No, a hobby project by a…. No, a hobby project by a student is not a better option than Chromium. Something would have to be…. The problem with Chromium is…. Mozilla needs to comply with…. Mozilla has its issues, but…. Years ago I remember the…. Something to think about when you think about the meaning of the phrase "government requests".
And we need to change that. The popularity of the Tor Browser has risen very rapidly over the last period of time. It was originally developed by the US Naval Research Lab in the mids to allow government officials to communicate in an anonymous and secure manner. Nowadays, most people tend to use the Tor Browser because it gives them the freedom to keep their privacy and anonymity on the internet.
A team of developers and some of the Tor Browser volunteers have successfully managed to create a browser by modifying a version of the Mozilla Firefox web browser that allows users to browse the internet anonymously. It involves a number of volunteer relays where Internet traffic bounces and guarantees that the user is not monitored. Once the user is done with surfing, the Tor Browser itself terminates the session by removing or disabling a range of confidential data such as user history, HTTP cookies, etc.
Reinforcement Learning. R Programming. React Native. Python Design Patterns. Python Pillow. Python Turtle. Verbal Ability. Interview Questions.